Posts Tagged ‘in rainbows’


Off This Century – My Favorite Albums of 2000-2009

December 25, 2009

Radiohead – In Rainbows Bonus Disk

December 4, 2007

Well, seeing as how the diskbox has been shipped and people are starting to get their packages, I think it is appropriate to give a little acknowledgment to CD2 of In Rainbows, the bonus disk.

The disk consists of eight tracks, all of which are outtakes from the In Rainbows sessions. They sound like the other In Rainbows tracks in terms of production which to honest, isn’t really that great. I mean, the album is produced fine, but I have my gripes about it. Thom’s vocals sometimes need a little work. Especially the beginning of Bodysnatchers, where he sounds horribly aloft and mediocre, which makes no sense considering the end of that song has some of his best vocal moments ever.

But it just feels like more work could have gone into making these songs sound exciting. It was the same way with Videotape. Although there was an intended effect to the studio version of Videotape, it lost a great amount of it’s energy and charm from the live versions. Some of these recordings that we find on the bonus disk are equally as reserved, except this time more boring. Down Is The New Up was the reason I was excited about this bonus disk in the first place, and unfortunately it is given pretty lame treatment for how great of a song it is. Thom’s vocals are tired and mediocre, and the song could have been made much faster. The catch of it is that it is briefly dressed up with some really cool, sweeping strings, like the ones that make many of the In Rainbows songs really great. But they are very brief and should have been utilized more. To be honest, Down Is the New Up had the potential to be one of the best songs from the In Rainbows sessions, but it was simply botched. What you hear here sounds like a b-side, and it shouldn’t have been one. It’s nice to have the studio version though, even if it is a disappointment compared to some live versions you can get.

There was a big fiasco on a lot of Radiohead websites discussing what tracks MK1 and MK2 could possibly be once the tracklists were announced. Some people were thinking short instrumental interludes, and they were right. They are brief, minute long little vignettes that could have served as in betweens on the album. They sound interesting enough for what they are, but the choice to not include them was probably good, considering they are potentially uninteresting. You can hear how they fit in though. This makes them useful for understanding In Rainbows more, even if they are filler. But the catch is, they seem to come in a natural progression. MK1 rounds off Videotape, making this disk seem like an extention of the first disk. I, however, am pretty certain that both disks were not meant to be played together in this exact order. I guess I have no way of knowing for certain, but it is pretty obvious that the better tracks made the main release, and these songs don’t really feel like they progress as smoothly as the album.

There are some more relaxed, downtempo songs to be found here. Last Flowers was a favorite among fans, and was long hoped to clinch the album. However, it only made it as a b-side. It may be overrated, but it sure is a nice little song worthy of being recorded. When Thom shouts “Releeeeeasse” among his classic set of Radiohead lyrics, it reminds me of Morning Bell to a certain extent. It’s fractured, subtle, and ultimately beautiful. Quite nice. Another nice surprise is 4 Minute Warning. Instead of the sweeping piano treatment given during the live tour, the song is now mostly mellowed out. The finished product contains some nice vocal harmonization, acoustic guitar, piano, and tambourine, finished off with some nice studio tricks. It’s lazy, rhythmic, and potentially beautiful. A nice little surprise. It complements House of Cards very well. This easily could have been on the album.

The one I am probably most disappointed with is Bangers & Mash, but I was never impressed with it even when it was live. It’s a decent song, but sub-par when compared to the quality of most Radiohead songs. The drums sound dull, and it sounds like a rehash of Bodysnatchers, except this time kinda crappy. It sounds dry, to be honest.

What it needed was the kind of touchup that Go Slowly and Up On The Ladder are given. Both of these songs are fantastic. Go Slowly at first plays like a guitar accompanying a creepy old music box, and then quickly gains momentum and ends up being one of the saddest songs of the new bunch. Thom’s vocals are given an almost Sigur Ros esque treatment, building up to a heavy, desolate, trudging riff. It’s very nice. Up On The Ladder plays a similar game, but with more sheen. The song is bathed in beautiful echo, from the light percussion, to a lovely organ, to the vocals. The guitar riff has a comparably rhythmic twang to it.

In short, it’s good, as any Radiohead is, but you can see why these tracks are b-sides. This should be a no brainer for any fan though. These songs complete In Rainbows, and they are all very good. Production gripes aside, In Rainbows is a great album with great outtakes.


Radiohead – In Rainbows

October 11, 2007

The new Radiohead album is here. I think that me explaining the circumstances behind the album are redundant and unnecessary, because it has been such a big deal lately, but I’ll do it anyway for those who haven’t heard. Radiohead have been working on their new album on and off for several years. With few announcements. Information has trickled through their blog, Dead Air Space, in fragments. Ten days ago, Radiohead announced that their new album, In Rainbows, would be released in ten days. Not in stores, not on iTunes (as if), and not on Amazon. The two ways that you can acquire Radiohead’s new album as of yet are through download and a diskbox to be released in December. Both are ordered directly from Radiohead via their W.A.S.T.E. shop on their website. You can pay as much as you want for that download. One hundred pounds. Ten pounds. Nothing. You can download this album for free. How much do you want to support Radiohead? The diskbox costs the equivalent of $80, and contains two CDs, art books, and two records. There is some speculation of an in-stores release early next year, but there is no solid evidence yet. Radiohead are a free agent. There is no record label.

This is by far the most bizarre album release I have ever heard of. It’s inconvenient to say the least. Not everyone can afford to drop that much money on the box set for the full In Rainbows experience, deal with currency exchange, or even use a credit card. Hell, not everybody has a record player. This release is somewhat difficult to receive, but on the other hand fans are hailing this as one of the most important album releases ever. Radiohead are not the first band to release something free of a record label like that, but no band this popular has released an album this anticipated in such a way. Within days of the announcement, Nine Inch Nails, Jamiroquai, and Oasis expressed their interest in independence of any record labels as well. Whether Radiohead have the power to put todays messed up record industry back in it’s place is not certain.

This is only so much of a concern, for now. The download has been released. Ten new Radiohead songs are streaming incessantly through the ears of, literally, millions of Radiohead fans. This is an exciting day. For having waited so many years, to have silently churned about a lack of new material for so long… And then they announce their album a week before release.

I am listening to the new Radiohead album.


Radiohead test drove most of their new songs on the tour last year. I had the official Mortigi Tempo bootleg of what users thought the album should sound like, MTLP7. Nothing could have prepared me for this album. Having the studio recordings is like making these songs new again. The concern for a lot of people was that the album would not have a distinct flavor, or theme, like all of the other Radiohead albums have had. This was likely a concern for the bands last album, Hail To The Thief, released in about the same with, with all the songs being toured and then released. Even when Radiohead’s albums are big puzzles or messes, they still fit together perfectly. Every one of these ten songs are wonderful. Radiohead have become so consistent that I am starting to get afraid. No one is without fault, but I have to search pretty hard to find fault in Radiohead’s music.

I’m finding it very hard to actually start reviewing the album here.

The album starts with the bands most rhythmic song to date, 15 Step, which starts as a mellow groove over a danceable backbeat. This was one hell of a selection for a first song, being one of the bands most popular new songs, but it also has a lot of work to do to let the listener know that the band have not lost their touch. On one hand, Thom Yorke’s voice is still in prime condition and has not deteriorated in the slightest since Hail To The Thief. The songs breakdown reaffirms how good the band is at developing their songs and going places with them. Never a dull moment. Especially surprising is the brief vocal sample of a group of school children that details the song twice. Mysterious, dark, energetic, even sexy.

What was impressive about Kid A and Hail To The Thief, how an album of completely unique and different sounding songs fit together well, also holds true about In Rainbows. The album can be dark, sad, or happy. But one of the finest, most recognizable new kicks that catches my ear throughout is the use of strings in many of the songs. In that way, Radiohead really hit my weak spot, because I am very much a sucker for those stringed instruments. Nude, All I Need, the completely new Faust Arp, and Reckoner among others contain these strings and use them to their fullest. It’s a lush, important sounding album. Also, in general, the album is much more beat driven.

Which brings up the first issue I have with the album. Sometimes the drums just don’t have enough power. 15 Step, House of Cards, and a few others could have used some live drums, or at least a touchup. Part of what made 15 Step so unbelievable when we first heard it was how ungodly heavy that bass was. It’s not really here anymore. Those 2006 tour bootlegs are still assets, because the earlier forms of these songs are, at times, very telling as well. The same goes for the closer, Videotape, which is a great song but lost a little bit of it’s urgency in production. This seems to be the biggest complaint about the album from fans. The original version built to a wrenching climax with guitars, but the final version has taken those away and left the ending more subtle. It’s another reason to get interested in those bootlegs. But the final product is what really matters.

In Rainbows can really rock out. Bodysnatchers and Jigsaw Falling Into Place both have a lot of muscle. I love that bassline on Jigsaw Falling Into Place. It complements the distorted vocals really well. The band still have that attention to detail that has made them so successful before. But the album is probably most impressive when it hits it’s softer, more emotional spots.

The song that caught me as most impressive on the first listen was Reckoner. Seeing where this song has come from the beginning is baffling. When it was first played in concert, Reckoner was a short rocker. It was an eastern sounding solo acoustic outing. Powerful, but simple. Just Thom on vocals and Jonny on guitar. Featured a minor second to make it sound a little eastern. Tough. It was one of my favorites. But on In Rainbows, Reckoner sounds completely different. It is easily my favorite song on the album. The song has been changed from energetic and almost angry to sad and momentous. Thom’s falsetto is chilling yet warm, haunting yet angelic. This song represents exactly what Radiohead does right with guitars, using them sparsely to detail songs even when it might take really close listening to notice them. Those strings are just downright disarming. It’s been a long time, since OK Computer really, that Radiohead have sounded this tragic and yet not helpless, or have been this detailed in their sadness. Complete triumph.

House of Cards is probably my second favorite, also a complete win. Never before have Radiohead made a song this relaxing or comforting. That isn’t to say that it is unrealistic though. While you could close your eyes and travel to some sunny beach easily within the care of this simple guitar riff, it also contains a little bit of stressed distortion and odd sound effects. In any case, this is one of the most gorgeous, strong, and happy songs the band has ever made.

What needs to be kept in mind is that this is not the full picture. This is In Rainbows, the album, but not the music in it’s entirety. Until we get the diskbox in December, we will have to wait to see the artwork and hear the bonus disk of other new material. But this is the strongest stuff, I trust. When we get the rest I can imagine things will only get better.

In Rainbows is perfect. Just as good as OK Computer and Kid A, which both also achieved perfection. I think what really amazes me is how completely forward Radiohead fans have been with this album even on this first day. It will take time for a nostalgic bond to be created, and that is what has made OK Computer and Kid A so loved. This bond is inevitable for In Rainbows. Even after recognizing my minor production gripes, they have dissolved after less than a day. This really is one of the best albums in years. I might even say the best album since Kid A. There are no bad songs. The album hits the whole emotional spectrum. What this album does, through it’s music as well as it’s circumstances, is completely cement the trust between artist and listener. What it also proves is that Radiohead are not comparable to anything but themselves at any given time, thus making what was already perfect shine even more. This is the new Radiohead album. This is Radiohead. This is perfection.